Choose your case and get a hint when you need one. Hints are revealed one at a time – from a gentle nudge in the right direction to a red-hot hint that almost gives away the answer.
The Author\'s Last Book
The Doping Doctor
Mordet på Fjordhyttene
Hvem hadde egentlig ingen solid grunn til å begå drapet på Erik?
Erik har kranglet med en person, men de gjorde opp.
Hvem har Erik beklaget til?
Se på skjermbildene fra telefonen. Hvem tilhører nummeret?
I Eriks lomme fant vi en mystisk lapp signert «Fjordens beskytter». Hvem mistenker du kan ha skrevet den?
Navnet på signaturen kan peke mot noen som ønsker å verne naturen, men det kan være et falskt spor.
Håndskrift kan røpe mer enn man tror.
Se på håndskriften. Hvem skriver på en lignende måte i intressantskjemaet?
Fotspor ble funnet under vinduet til Eriks hytte. Hvem kan dette ha vært?
Fotspor avslører ofte mer enn det en tror.
Skostørrelse er ofte ganske viktig.
Se under skostørrelse i interessentskjemaene. Disse er oppført først i EU-størrelser, deretter i cm.
En ødelagt og kostbar gjenstand ble funnet i skisporet utenfor hyttene. Hvorfor er dette relevant?
Finn gjenstanden. Er det noe spesielt du legger merke til?
Et spor i snøen kan si noe om hvor og når eieren faktisk befant seg.
Vet du hva som skjer med knuste klokker? De går ikke.
Hvem eide den ødelagte klokken?
Gjenstanden tilhører en type samleobjekt. Hvem samler på slike?
Hvem er kjent for sin Rolex-samling?
Les i nyhetsartikkelen.
Et bilde tatt av et viltkamera dukker opp i etterforskningen. Hvorfor kan dette ha noe å si?
NÃ¥r ca. ble bildet tatt?
Nordlyset var kun på himmelen en begrenset periode. Hvilke tidspunkt var dette?
Se tidspunktet nordlyset skjedde i nyhetsartikkelen. Hvordan henger dette sammen med dødstidspunktet?
Hvor lang tid tar det å gå fra stedet der nordlyset ble dokumentert, til Eriks hytte?
Hvordan ligger hytten i forhold til viltkameraet?
Se på kartet. Viltkameraer er markert med et eget symbol. Hvilken hytte bodde Erik på?
Se forklaringen til Lars. Hva sier den om avstand?
Hvem er portrettert i viltkamerabildene?
Er det et gjenkjennbart trekk kun én av dem har?
Noe i bildet kan sammenlignes med interessentskjemaet. Hva er dette?
Se på hårfarge.
Hvilket bevismateriale avdekker en løgn i én av forklaringene?
Noen hevdet å ha måkt snøen foran resepsjonen etter kl. 21:00.
Når var siste snøfall?
Se på bevisene. Hva stemmer ikke med at siste snøfall skjedde i går ettermiddag?
Hvem beviser dette at har løyet om hvor de var?
Han eier hyttene og påsto å ha vært opptatt med annet arbeid på drapstidspunktet.
Hvis snøen var uberørt, kan ikke arbeidet ha funnet sted der han sa det gjorde.
Episode 1 – The First Readers at Liahytta
Your goal is to identify the four guests, their relationship to Henrik, and where they were between 22:00 and 23:30.
Review the interviews and the different pieces of evidence. Build a timeline. Also cross-check what the different suspects say about each other.
Episode 2 – Draft V12
Your goal is to find out how Henrik died, and to map everyone who may have had a motive to want him dead.
A staged accident scene often contains details that do not fit the natural event.
Think both about the injuries, where loose objects should have ended up, and whether something may have been put back. The motives are found in what each person feared losing.
Compare the autopsy with the technical crime scene report, especially the injury sequence, the flashlight, and the woodpile. For the motives: read the search report against the new interviews, the contract folder, the SMS extract, and the manuscript excerpt.
Episode 3 – Summer 2011
Your goal is to understand the Linnea Bråthen case, the role it has in Still Water, and who tried to sell the manuscript.
Some of the smallest details only become useful when they appear more than once.
For the Bråthen case: review all submitted documents, the NRK article, and anything else you find. For the manuscript sale: pay attention to wording that appears in more than one place.
The forum post ends with the phrase \"keep it between the covers\". Can you find it again somewhere else?
Episode 4 – The End of the Case
Your goal is to find out who killed Henrik Solberg, why, and how.
Henrik has already given you the key, but it is in material from an earlier episode.
A letter in the alphabet has been shifted by a certain number of places. Can you work out how many? Once the text becomes readable, do not only read the plot. Also notice how the sentences begin, and whether an object has been mentioned earlier. Is there also something strange about the taxi receipt?
Look at the notes \"shift 17\" and \"MK quality assurance\" in Henrik\'s calendar. Decode it using caesar shirt. Once the chapter has been decoded, read the first letter of each sentence and compare the silver ring in the text with the seizure list from the search. Can you find the area where the taxi ride ends anywhere else?
Episode 1 – Storgata 14
Your goal is to find the cause of death, determine whether Sverre was killed, and establish who was at or near the clinic that same day.
A fixed medical routine may have made Sverre the person who triggered the fatal reaction himself. Also separate what people claim from what independent evidence confirms.
Was there something Sverre could not tolerate, and how might his routine have allowed him to take it into his body? License plate numbers can be very useful for placing people in different locations.
Compare the autopsy report with Sverre\\\'s medical article, Anette\\\'s witness statement, and the information about the B12 syringes. Also compare the supply inventory with the number of syringes found in the crime scene report. For the movements: compare the registration numbers in the person-of-interest forms with the images from Stortorget parking garage and the AutoPASS extract.
Episode 2 – The Traces
Your goal is to find out what Sverre was going to reveal in the documentary, and who the hotel receipt belongs to.
The two tasks can be solved separately. One is about what Sverre wanted to say, while the other is about identifying a person even though the name is not written down.
Look at Sverre\\\'s emails. Is there anything he tells his wife he is going to do? Is there anything on the hotel receipt that you can find elsewhere?
For the confession: compare the messages between Ingunn and Sverre with the telecom extract, the inbox, and the email exchange about the recovery infusions. Sverre talked about \\\"one man\\\" and wanted to warn that person. Use the SMS extract to work out which date Friday is. For the hotel receipt: follow the card ending `**** 4821` through the airport receipt and the SAS overview.
Episode 3 – The Motives
Your goal is to find out which cefazolin dispensing was used to poison Sverre, and to establish the motive of each suspect.
Even if a label is fake, there may still be identifying information underneath it. And can you find out who the loan document belongs to?
An alias is less reliable than a phone number. For the motive: what happens to the different participants if Sverre talks? And has anyone threatened him?
Compare the batch number under the B12 label in the crime scene report with the pharmacy extract. Then check the phone number on the relevant dispensing against the person-of-interest forms and the hotel follow-up. The motives are in the interviews, the email thread with Aksel, and the loan document with its accompanying clauses.
Episode 4 – The End of the Case
Your goal is to find out who killed Sverre, why, and when the syringe was swapped.
Do not look for the killer around the time of death. The syringe may have been swapped several hours earlier.
Find a time when a digital action was registered as Sverre\\\'s, while he was provably busy somewhere else. Can you find his HPR number anywhere?
Compare the refrigerator events in the Kripos log with the landline log and the patient history. For the prescription pad: compare Reidar Solem\\\'s description of the family and the farm with earlier information and photos.